Legal Opinion
State Nat. Bank v. Winn
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 2, 1914No. 20,010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District •Court, Parish of Jefferson Davis; Alfred M. Barbe, Judge. Action by the State National Bank against I-Iezekiah Winn on promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant takes devolutive appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
On March 22, 1913, plaintiff brought suit against defendant on a promissory note, made by him to its order, and ealised a writ of attachment to issue, under which certain movable property was seized. On April 29th following defendant filed a pleading, reading, in part, as follows:
“Comes the defendant, and, before pleading to the merits as to the writ of attachment sued out herein, with respect, represents.”
Then follows an “exception” to certain paragraphs in the affidavit for attachment, on the ground that they disclose no cause of action; then a “plea” that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
- Herrmann v. AmédéeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- Fisher v. HoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1811
- Macarty v. LepaullardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pittman v. LillySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Swift & Co. v. Leon Cahn & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Morfessis v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Motor Finance Co. v. LynnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932