Legal Opinion · Dissent

International Ass'n of Bridge v. J & N Steel & Erection Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 13, 2001No. 99-4075Published

1DissentDaughtrey, Circuit Judge

DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.

The majority holds that the Unions, by their conduct, explicitly terminated the collective bargaining agreements at issue in this case, relieving J&N Steel of its contractual obligation to arbitrate all disputes arising from those agreements. I believe the question of whether the Unions’ conduct may constitute proper notice of termination such that J & N’s obligations would end is a question that must be submitted to arbitration under the agreements’ express terms. I therefore find the resolution of that question to lie outside the purview of both this court and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. General Drivers, Salesmen And Warehousemen's Local Union No. 984 v. Malone & Hyde, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API