Legal Opinion

Menihan Co. v. Hopkins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County to the Court of Civil Appeals and by certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court.— M. H. Meeks, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

The defendant in error, plaintiff below, HopMns, was employed hy the Menihan Company as a salesman for one year, at compensation of $1500, salary to he paid monthly at the rate of $125 a month. He was wrongfully discharged near the middle of the contract year (about June 1st), but his salary np to that date was paid. He obtained other employment of a similar nature on September 15th, and for the remainder of the year received salary from his new employer at the rate of $150 per month.

This suit was begun December 8th to enforce compensation for “salary account for the months of June, *26July,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Olmstead v. BachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  3. Doherty v. Schipper & BlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Allen v. MaronneTennessee Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Tennessee Walking Horse Breeders' Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  2. Baird v. McDaniel Printing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  3. Collins v. Summers Hardware and Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  4. Jeffers v. StanleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Engstrom v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API