Legal Opinion

Pride v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Indictment for robbery. Before Judge Roan. Pulton superior court. April 25, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The defendant was indicted for robbery, and the indictment was framed under the act of 1903, amending the Penal Code, §151; the charge was laid substantially in the language of the amendment. A demurrer was interposed on the grounds, that the indictment failed to allege that the robbery was committed by force or intimidation, and because the act of 1903 created a new statutory offense, and that no penalty was prescribed for the violation of the act. The demurrer was overruled, and the points thereby made are now under review.

Penal Code, §151, defines robbery: “Robbery is the wrongful,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Long v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Hickey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Pride v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Rivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Searcy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Dotson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API