Legal Opinion

Caterpillar, Inc. v. Hightower

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 7, 1992No. 1901465PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Caterpillar, Inc. ("Caterpillar"), appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Jimmie and Corene Hightower in their action against Caterpillar alleging injury as the result of a defective product. We affirm.

On September 28, 1987, Mr. Hightower was operating a Model 518 "skidder" for his employer, Dudley Land and Timber Company ("Dudley").1 The skidder was manufactured in 1975 by Caterpillar: it had no doors or other mechanisms to enclose the sides of the operator's compartment. While operating the skidder in thick, partially felled timber, Mr. Hightower was severely injured…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Roberts v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. First Bank of Boaz v. FielderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. O.K. Bonding Co., Inc. v. MiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. The Booth, Inc. v. MilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,892 John Richards, as Conservator, Etc. v. Michelin Tire Corp., the Budd Company Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. In re Simon II LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  4. Shoals Ford, Inc. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Independent Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API