TChutima, Inc. v. Bua Group, LLC
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 TCUTIMA, INC., Case No.2:24-CV-1130 JCM (NJK) 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 BUA GROUP, LLC, 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 15). Plaintiffs filed 14 a response (ECF No. 19), to which defendant replied (ECF No. 20). The court first DENIES 15 defendant’s original motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6) as MOOT in light of the plaintiffs’ amended 16 complaint (“FAC”). For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS defendant’s present motion 17 to dismiss. (ECF No. 15). 18 Also…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.