Legal Opinion

Siskie v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 21, 2016No. CASE NO. 5:14CV1598PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

[Resolving ECF No. 33]

Benita Y. Pearson, United States District Judge

Pending is Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 33). The Court has been advised, having reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs claims for reasonable accommodation and intentional infliction of emotional distress are dismissed.

I.Stipulated Facts

The stipulated facts1 are as follows:

1. Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pippin v. City of ReynoldsburgDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API