Legal Opinion

Sean Michaels, Inc., Sara Michaels, Inc. v. United States Postal Service

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 21, 1981No. 80-1254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

We are called upon in these, consolidated cases to determine whether the Postal Service properly concluded that two companies breached the terms of consent agreements which prohibited them from making certain claims in the advertising of their products. One of the companies, Sean Michaels, Inc. (Sean Michaels), markets the “Sean Michaels Bust Expander,” an “exercise device designed to improve and enhance the female user’s bust features.” Appellants’ Brief at 4. The other, Sara Michaels, Inc. (Sara Michaels), markets the “Sara Michaels Protein for the Bust,” a “food…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. N. Van Dyne Advertising Agency, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  3. American Consumer, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dynaquest Corp. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Dynaquest Corp. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API