Legal Opinion

Pierre-Louis v. Colonial Insurance Co. of California

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 15, 1990No. 89-2024PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm, rejecting both parties’ claims of error by the trial court. As to appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in reducing the punitive damages award, we explain our reasoning in leaving that decision intact so that the parties may seek review if we are incorrect in our interpretation of the prevailing law.

The trial court entered an order denying the appellee’s motion for new trial but granting a request to reduce the punitive damage award or, alternatively, ordering a new trial. The punitive damage claim involved herein is predicated upon a statute, rather than the common law. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. National Security Fire & Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Dunn v. Nat. SEC. Fire and Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Gates v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API