Legal Opinion

Nogowski v. Alemo-Hammad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1997PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHILLER, Judge.

Appellant, Dr. Saeid Alemo-Hammad, brings this appeal from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting a new trial. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS:

On February 12, 1986, appellant performed back surgery, specifically a laminectomy, on appellee, Ona Nogowski. During the course of the surgery appellant placed surgical sponges within appellee’s body. Appellant testified that at the conclusion of the surgery he was responsible for the removal of the sponges. However, due to a miscount one sponge remained in appellee’s body after the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Mitzelfelt v. KamrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. In Re FioriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. In Re DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Buckley v. Exodus Transit & Storage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Shannon v. McNultySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API