Legal Opinion

Buffalo General Hospital v. Sipprell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum herein, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Although an article 78 proceeding is not the proper method for the Buffalo General Hospital (the Hospital) to enforce an alleged contract right against the Bristol Home, Inc. (the Home), the latter interposed an answer and defended the proceeding as an action and first raised the question of the propriety of the proceeding on the oral argument before us. Under such circumstances we treat the proceeding against the Home *978as an action for declaratory judgment (see CPLR…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Towers Man. Corp. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Amsterdam City Hospital v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. People ex rel. Broadway & Ninety-sixth Street Realty Co. v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. St. Joseph's Hospital v. HillmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  5. Matter of St. Joseph's Hospital v. HillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Geherin v. SylvesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API