Sweet v. Grange Mut. Casualty Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPutman, J.
In this case we hold that the trial court should have sent a claim for punitive damages for a claimed tort arising in conjunction with a claimed wilful breach of contract to the jury for their determination of the issues of whether such a breach occurred and if so the amount of such damages.
Originally, the plaintiff-appellant, hereafter referred to as Sweet, filed a complaint containing two counts against the defendant-appellee, hereafter referred to as Grange, the insurer of Sweet’s 1972 Dodge automobile.
The first count alleged in substance that Grange had issued a $100 deductible automobile…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sidney J. Brown v. James R. Coates, Marion E. Coates, and Margaret E. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Kirk v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1970
- Fuchs v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Ardesco Oil Co. v. Richardson & TackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Roberts v. Western-Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- R & H Trucking, Inc. v. Occidental Fire & Cas. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ali v. Jefferson Insurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Curran v. VincentOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.