Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Grange Mut. Casualty Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1975No. 607PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPutman, J.

In this case we hold that the trial court should have sent a claim for punitive damages for a claimed tort arising in conjunction with a claimed wilful breach of contract to the jury for their determination of the issues of whether such a breach occurred and if so the amount of such damages.

Originally, the plaintiff-appellant, hereafter referred to as Sweet, filed a complaint containing two counts against the defendant-appellee, hereafter referred to as Grange, the insurer of Sweet’s 1972 Dodge automobile.

The first count alleged in substance that Grange had issued a $100 deductible automobile…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sidney J. Brown v. James R. Coates, Marion E. Coates, and Margaret E. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. Kirk v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1970
  3. Fuchs v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Ardesco Oil Co. v. Richardson & TackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Roberts v. Western-Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  3. R & H Trucking, Inc. v. Occidental Fire & Cas. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Ali v. Jefferson Insurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Curran v. VincentOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API