Legal Opinion

Shupe v. ROSE'S STORES, INCORPORATED

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 27, 1972No. Record 7930PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtI’Anson, J.

This action for libel, under the common law and the insulting words statute, Code § 8-630, was instituted by Catherine H. Shupe, plaintiff, against Rose’s Stores, Incorporated, defendant, to recover compensatory and punitive damages. The case was tried to a jury, and at the conclusion of all the evidence defendant renewed its motion to strike out plaintiff’s evidence. The motion was sustained by the trial court, and summary judgment was entered dismissing plaintiff’s action.

The controlling question presented is whether the trial court erred in striking out plaintiff’s evidence and dismissing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carwile v. Richmond Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  2. M. Rosenberg & Sons, Inc. v. CraftSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  3. Weaver v. Beneficial Finance CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1959

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gazette, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. Fleming v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  3. Tronfeld v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. General Products Co., Inc. v. Meredith Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  5. Kalantar v. Lufthansa German AirlinesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API