Legal Opinion

Tronfeld v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 3, 2006No. Record 052635PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice G. STEVEN AGEE.

Jay Tronfeld appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of Petersburg sustaining a demurrer on behalf of the defendants, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company ("Nationwide") and Todd Schmitt (collectively, the "Defendants"). On appeal, Tronfeld asserts the trial court erred in finding that the alleged statements were opinion and thus not actionable under Virginia law as defamation per se. For the reasons set forth below, we will reverse the judgment of the trial court.

I. BACKGROUND AND MATERIAL PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Nationwide employed Schmitt as an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Chaves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. Fox v. CustisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. Ward's Equipment, Inc. v. New Holland North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  5. Gazette, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Abi-Najm v. Concord Condominium, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  2. Augusta Mut. Ins. Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  3. Kellermann v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  4. Charles v. Front Royal Volunteer Fire & Rescue Department, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014
  5. Dodge v. TRUSTEES OF RANDOLPH-MACONSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API