Legal Opinion
Weis v. Richartz
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided October 13, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.
The complaint sets up two causes of action, the first by Harold Weis to recover for personal injuries in the sum of $3,000, claimed to have been inflicted upon him by the defendant in what is described as a billiard parlor conducted by the defendant, and the second by John B. Weis to recover the sum of $1,000 for loss of services and for medical care and attendance in the treatment of the infant for said injuries. In their complaint the plaintiffs demand judgment for $4,000, with costs and disbursements. The defendant moves to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that this' court has no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lewkowicz v. . Queen Aeroplane Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Lewkowicz v. Queen Aeroplane Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Dilworth v. Yellow Taxi Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
- Ralli v. PearsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dobrikin v. Union Railway Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1927
- Colla v. Carmichael U-Drive Autos, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1930