Legal Opinion

Bobby Wolfe v. Chrysler Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 18, 1984No. 83-8399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal in this diversity case raises an interesting question: What constitutes a new van? We hold that because the question required a jury response, the district court erred in entering summary judgment.

I

Chrysler Corporation sold a 1980 Dodge van to Greenbrier Dodge, Inc., in March of 1980. Greenbrier performed service work on the van’s transmission and replaced the vehicle’s torque converter with one that had been remanufactured by Chrysler at its factory. Greenbrier sold the van to Joe Nix Dodge, Inc., which later sold it as a new vehicle to Bobby Wolfe.

Nearly a year and a half after…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sweat v. Miller Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Studebaker Corporation v. NailCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. UIV CORP. v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Tolar Construction Co. v. GAF Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Bob Maddox Dodge, Inc. v. McKieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pro-Fab, Inc. v. Vipa, Inc., and Community BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. nVision Global Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Cardinal Health 5, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
  3. Vivid Investments, Inc. v. Best Western Inn--Forsyth, Ltd., Edward P. Douglas, Cpa, John S. Scatena, Defendants-Third Party Vijay Patel, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Bohannon v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1986
  5. VC MACON GA LLC v. VIRGINIA COLLEGE LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API