Legal Opinion

In re Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1994No. 94-BG-525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, an attorney, consented to his disbarment in the District of Columbia in August 1981 after being charged with disciplinary violations for alleged mishandling of funds in three probate matters. We previously denied a petition for reinstatement which he filed in 1987. In re Brown, 617 A.2d 194 (D.C.1992). We now accept the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility and a Hearing Committee that petitioner be reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia on two conditions.* See In re Roundtree, 503 A.2d 1215, 1217 (D.C.1985) (summarizing criteria for reinstatement).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In Re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. In Re TinsleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API