Legal Opinion

City of Des Moines v. Horrabin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 15, 1927PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

This suit involves the right of the city of Des Moines to recover moneys which it is alleged were wrongfully paid by said city from the general fund to the defendant, a contractor, in excess of the contract price for paving improvements under the special assessment plan. The facts are not in dispute.

It appears that, on May 28, 1917, the defendant entered into a written contract with the city of Des Moines for the paving of Ingersoll Avenue from Seventeenth Street to Twenty-eighth Street. No question arises as to the regularity or the legality of the letting of this contract. It is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. First National Bank v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Atkinson v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Mills County v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Humboldt County v. Incorporated Town of Dakota CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. MADRID LUMBER COMPANY v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Horrabin Paving Co. v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Carlson v. City of MarshalltownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Everds Brothers v. GillespieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API