Legal Opinion

In Re Forfeiture of Certain Personal Property

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1992No. Docket 93409, 93410PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented by the application for leave to appeal filed by the Oakland County Prosecutor is whether the proceedings to forfeit cash and other items of personal property on the ground that they were related to drug trafficking should be conducted in the Oakland Circuit Court or the Macomb Circuit Court. The Court of Appeals concluded that the case should proceed in the Macomb Circuit Court. We reverse.

i

On February 22, 1989, the Hazel Park Police Department (Oakland County) responded to a report of a disturbance and discovered 2.8 kilograms of cocaine in the trunk of an automobile that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maclean v. SpeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Axtell v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Bloemsma v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Detroit Trust Co. v. ManilowMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re Forfeiture of $28,088 of United States CurrencyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Burns v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Michigan Up & Out of Poverty Now Coalition v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. In re Forfeiture of a Quantity of MarijuanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API