Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Hull
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Chapman, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
This cause was before this court at the January, 1887, term. By reference to the reported case, 21 Neb., 371 et seq., it will be seen that the action was brought in the court below by the plaintiff against the defendants, in the nature of ejectment, for the possession of lots 14, 15, 16, and 17 in block 70, in the city of Lincoln; that at the trial to the district court there was a finding and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in so far as lots 14 and 17 were concerned, and in favor of the defendant as to lots 15 and 16. In this court, so much of the judgment as was in favor of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hull v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
- Hiatt v. BrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District v. WalstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Roberts v. Sioux City & Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- People ex rel. Coffey v. Judge of the District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Burnham v. BennisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.