State v. Groos
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHixtman, J.
The defendant appeals from the refusal of the trial court to set aside the verdict. As to this, we cannot find that the verdict is so palpably against the evidence as to warrant us in setting it aside. The question is not whether this court, upon the evidence as it appears in the record, would come to the same conclusion as did the jury, but whether that conclusion is manifestly unreasonable under all the circumstances—one which no jury, acting fairly and reasonably, could reach on the evidence before it. State v. Chin Lung, 106 Conn. 701, 704, 139 Atl. 91; Brooks’ Appeal, 68 Conn. 294, 296,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Nicholas v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Commonwealth v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. CariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. TurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. TowlesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.