Hamilton v. Sidwell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 47. — ACTION FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT BY R. J. SIDWELL AND OTHERS AGAINST L. S. HAMILTON AND OTHERS. Appeal from Clark Circuit Court. James M. Benton, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Settle
Affirming.
Appellees by a written contract sold appellants, for the consideration therein recited, a parcel of real estate in the city of Winchester, for which they executed a deed in conformity to the contract and made a tender thereof to appellants. Appellants refused to *429accept the. deed thus tendered, and appellees thereupon brought suit against them in the court below for a specific performance of the contract. The answer of appellants made no objection to the form of the deed tendered, and admitted that it was executed in conformity to the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dinger v. LuckenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Gibson v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Moran v. MoranNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- Breidenthal v. GroomsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Preston v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.