Legal Opinion

Hejazi v. State of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 2021No. A175097PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

612 Submitted August 6, affirmed September 15, 2021 HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Lane County District Attorney, and Lane County, Defendants. Lane County Circuit Court 20AD0013; A175097

495 P3d 752

Amit K. Kapoor, Judge. Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as

314 Or App 612

(2021) 613 PER CURIAM As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or App 58, 60,

898 P2d 196

(1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stanwood v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Hejazi v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hejazi v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API