Sumey v. Fayette County
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
An attentive examination of the record satisfies us the judgment of compulsory nonsuit was proper and that the trial court did not err by its refusal to take it off. The testimony establishes the fact of the accident and the manner of its occurrence, but no more. Plaintiff, a farmer and owner and operator of a grain threshing outfit, comprising a traction engine, hay baler, threshing machine and water tank, the whole weighing over fourteen tons, attempted to drive the entire equipment over a county bridge. At the moment the four wheels of the tractor and the front…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rapho v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Propert v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Glancy v. McKees Rocks BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Murdaugh v. Oxford BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Zeher v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murray v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Quinn v. KumarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Wittwer v. County of RichardsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Hamilton v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Yordy v. County of NorthumberlandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931