Legal Opinion
Hook v. State of Ariz.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided October 17, 1995No. MC 95-86 PHX CAM, CIV 73-0097 PHX CAM, CIV 84-1626 PHX CAM, CIV 90-0054 PHX CAM and CIV 91-1808 PHX CAMPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR CONTEMPT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO MODIFY
DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge 1 .
The court heard Plaintiffs’ motions for contempt and Defendants’ motions for modification on September 28,1995. Andrew S. Gordon & Coppersmith and Gordon appeared on the briefs or at the hearing on behalf of the Plaintiffs in Hook v. Arizona. Joel W. Nomkin, Kirsten B. Rosati and Rachel Rife Weiss of Brown & Bain appeared on the briefs or at the hearing on behalf of the Plaintiffs in Gluth v. Kangas. Assistant Arizona Attorney General James Morrow and Charles J. Cooper,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Frost v. SymingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Frost v. SymingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Krug v. LutzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Krug v. LutzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Coalition for Economic Equity v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.