State ex rel. Sparkman v. State
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Per curiam
Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Relator’s remaining *490claims are repetitive and/or unsupported. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4. We attach hereto and make a part hereof the District Court’s written reasons denying relator’s application.
Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GriffinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. JosephLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Alonzo Ford Versus Darell Vannoy, WardenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
- State of Louisiana Versus Terrance MosleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
- State of Louisiana v. Dequincy Jamel LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.