United States v. Duke Energy Corp.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BULLOCK, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion to intervene as plaintiffs by various environmental groups. These groups are Environmental Defense, North Carolina Sierra Club, and North Carolina Public Interest Research Group Citizen Lobby/Education Fund (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Applicants”). Applicants’ motion to intervene is made pursuant to Rules 24(a) and 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, the court finds that Applicants have an unconditional statutory right to intervene, and Applicants’ motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- People of State of Ill. v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- New York v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Wildearth Guardians v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States v. Duke Energy CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Forest County Potawatomi Community v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. DaugaardDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.