Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Greene

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1938Published

1DissentFairchild, J.

{dissenting). The failure to accord full extent to the effect on the obligation of one party to a contract of a default by the other party is the basis of my objections to the decision. A contract is a plexus of mutual *167rights. It necessarily comprehends performance of various acts. Where the contract is executory on both sides and where the mutual promises are dependent, performance by one party cannot be required by the other party when in default amounting to a failure of consideration. 5 Page, Contracts (2d ed.), p. 5257, § 2977. In the case of Helbig v. Bonsness, ante, p. 52, 277 N. W.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reed v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Clason's Point Land Co. v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Ryan v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Helbig v. BonsnessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Baldwin v. BenedictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API