American Car & Foundry Co. v. Barry
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastfern District of Missouri. Action by Joseph F. Barry against the American Car & Foundry Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error, the American Car & Foundry Company, hereafter called the defendant, is engaged at St. Louis in the manufacture of cars for various railroads. September 29, 1909, a flat car was complete and ready for delivery to the Western Pacific Railroad. It was discovered that sufficient room did not exist between the upper and lower bolsters to give the car the proper side motion. ■' ■
Fabfc White, who was a foreman in the employ of the defendant, called in Mr. Joseph F. Barry and others to assist in fixing it. Mr. Barry is the defendant in error, and will be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Schoepper v. Hancock Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. HillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co. v. NunnemakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Kaemmerling v. Athletic Mining & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Kaemmerling v. Athletic Mining & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924