Legal Opinion

Martin v. Kansas National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1903No. 13,074PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

By this action plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, sought to recover from the defendants the proceeds of the sale of a car-load of hogs sent by him to the Wichita Live-stock Commission Company, to be sold by it on commission. This car-load of hogs was shipped by the plaintiff from Enid, Okla., consigned to himself at Wichita, Kan., with instructions to the commission company to sell the same and remit the proceeds. Being unable to find a suitable market'át *656Wichita, the commission company reshipped to Kansas City and notified the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. Valley State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kimmel v. BeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Inter-state National Bank v. RingoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Gunn v. Stock Yards State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Berg v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Wickens v. Valley State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API