Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided May 18, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Robert E. Talton Chair, Committee on Urban Affairs Texas House of Representatives Post Office Box 2910 Austin, Texas 78768-2910

Re: Whether a municipality that adopts its budget by ordinance must adopt budget amendments by ordinance (RQ-0414-GA)

Dear Representative Talton:

You ask whether in certain instances the City of Seabrook (the "City") amended its budget in a manner that is not consistent with applicable law.1 You ask in particular whether a municipality that adopts its budget by ordinance must adopt any budget amendments by ordinance. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Hutchins v. PrasifkaTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of San Antonio v. MicklejohnTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Red Bird Village v. State Ex Rel. City of DuncanvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. J. D. Abrams, Inc. v. SebastianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. City of Panhandle v. BickleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API