Legal Opinion · Concurrence

N.J.J. v. Wesfam Restaurants, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 2008No. 1070173Published

1ConcurrenceSmith, Justice

I concur with the main opinion’s holding that the trial court’s factual findings are not due to be disturbed.

In this worker’s compensation case the employee, N.J.J., seeks worker’s compensation benefits as a result of injuries sustained in a sexual assault that occurred as N.J.J. arrived at work at an early hour. Employers often pay workers’ compensation to employees for injuries that occur as the result of an on-the-job assault — including sexual assaults. However, this case involves a unique exception to that rule found in our workers’ compensation law.

Not every injury that occurs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Ex Parte Prof. Bus. Owners Ass'n Wkrs. Comp. FundSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Jasper City Council v. WoodsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Ex Parte SquiresSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. Squires v. City of SaralandCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API