Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Squires

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 1, 2006No. 1050900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shirley Squires and Ronald Squires sued the City of Saraland and the City of Saraland Board of Adjustments, claiming selective enforcement of a zoning ordinance. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the defendants. The Squireses appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, raising three issues: "(1) whether the City was equitably estopped from enforcing its zoning ordinance; (2) whether the City's zoning ordinance is unconstitutional as applied to the Squireses; and (3) whether the City's zoning ordinance may properly be applied to `day care homes' as defined in the Child Care Act." The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Smith v. Style Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Marvin's, Inc. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Ex Parte Northport Health Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Landers v. O'Neal Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. IEC Arab Alabama, Inc. v. City of ArabCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. Schillaci v. Gentry (Ex parte Gentry)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  3. Barry v. THE DM DRENNENSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Brewer v. AtkinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  5. Mousseau v. City of Daphne Board of Zoning AdjustmentsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API