Legal Opinion
Bach, Cory, & Co. v. Montana Lumber & Produce Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Third Judicial District, Deer Lodge County. Replevin. Judgment on the pleadings was rendered for the plaintiff by Woody, J.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Witt, J.
— This is an appeal from a judgment rendered on the pleadings. The action was in replevin. Upon complaint and answer filed the plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings upon the following grounds:
“ 1. That there is no denial in defendant’s answer of the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint that the defendant took and received the lumber in said complaint described.
“2. That defendants’ answer admits that the value of the lumber taken by defendant as alleged in plaintiff’s complaint was $618, and plaintiff should have judgment for such amount with legal interest thereon from the date of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Power v. GumMontana Supreme Court · 1886
- Laubenheimer v. McDermottMontana Supreme Court · 1885
- Toombs v. HornbuckleMontana Supreme Court · 1871
- Harris v. ShontzMontana Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by6 opinions
- Equity Co-operative Ass'n v. Equity Co-operative Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
- Cameron v. WentworthMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Bryant v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Floyd v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- Duane v. MolinakMontana Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.