Legal Opinion
30 RIVER COURT v. Capograsso
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 3, 2006PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
892 A.2d 711 (2006)
383 N.J. Super. 470
30 RIVER COURT EAST URBAN RENEWAL COMPANY and Lefrak Organization, Inc., Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Eleanor CAPOGRASSO, Defendant-Appellant.
Eleanor CAPOGRASSO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
30 River Court East Urban Renewal Company, Lefrak Organization, Inc., City of Jersey City, Jersey Department of Community Affairs, Michael Reegan, Walter Kreher and William Connolly, Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued Telephonically February 3, 2006.
Decided March 3, 2006.
Eleanor Capograsso, appellant, argued the cause pro se.
Marianne…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Marini v. IrelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Fusco v. Board of Educ. of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Ward v. ZelikovskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Walid v. IRENE COUTURE, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Saffos v. Avaya, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Nordstrom v. LyonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Borden v. CADLES OF GRASSY MEADOWSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- In re the November 2, 2010 General ElectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.