Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Baltimore County

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 6, 2006No. 0281PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In this appeal, we must decide the consequences of a failure to file a timely written response to a motion for summary judgment, as required by Md. Rule 2-501 (as amended in 2004) when the filings of the moving party contain a dispute of material fact. After the Workers’ Compensation Commission found in favor of appellant Stephen E. Thompson on his claim, Baltimore County appealed to the circuit court for that county. The circuit court granted the County’s motion for summary judgment, reasoning that Thompson’s failure to file a written response to the County’s motion justified that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Remsburg v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Pittman v. Atlantic Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Moore v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Blades v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Brown v. Suburban Cadillac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benway v. Maryland Port AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Thompson v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Candolfi v. Alterra GroupCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Tova Louie, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ahuva Saghi, et al. v. Ice Cream House, LLC, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API