Legal Opinion

Candolfi v. Alterra Group

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 30, 2022No. 0481/21Published

1Opinion of the Court

Melissa Candolfi v. Allterra Group, LLC, Case No. 481, September Term 2021. Opinion by Nazarian, J. CONTEMPT — DIRECT CIVIL CONTEMPT — NATURE OF VALID PURGE PROVISION Direct civil contempt must be used to coerce present or future compliance with a court order rather than punish past, completed conduct. Essential to a court’s imposition of civil contempt is the person’s ability to purge the contempt to avoid a sanction. To serve the coercive purpose of civil contempt, the sanction must be distinct from the purge provision and the valid legal requirement the court seeks to enforce. Circuit…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Dorn B. Holland v. Washington Homes, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  5. DeJarnette v. Corning Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API