Legal Opinion

Aladdin Oil Burner Corp. v. Morton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 9, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover the price of an oil burner sold and delivered to defendant under a contract which conditioned defendant’s liability for the purchase price upon a “reasonable satisfaction” with the equipment. The latter disaffirmed under this clause. The District Court judge, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment for the defendant.

The state of the case exhibits issues of fact; and in this situation it was error for the judge, at the close of the case, to deny the right of summation asserted by appellant. This constituted an…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yopps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. Clark Advertising Agency, Inc. v. James Tice, American Hot Rod AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Murin v. Frapaul Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Panko v. GrimesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. In Re Emileigh F.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API