Legal Opinion
Rothholz v. Dunkle
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
"Van Syckel, J.
This is an action for damages for an alleged libel contained in the following letter, written by Oliver E. Dunkle, the cashier of the Merchants’ Bank, of Atlantic City:
“Robert Ohnmeiss, Esq.:
“Enclosed please find one share of Merchants’ stock, received some time ago. Our board refuses to purchase at present, but hold under advisement. We have stricken your name from the bond of Mr. Carl Voelker, by request; also, Samuel Eothholz’s, as the latter has no financial standing.
“ Eespectfully,
“ O. E. Dunkle, Cashier.”
Eobert Ohnmeiss was a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. QuigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mick v. American Dental Assn.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Richardson v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Murphy v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
- DeVries v. McNeil Consumer Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.