Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals v. Rumple

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1973No. 973S192PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeBruler, J.

This case first originated by a petition, filed by appellee with the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, which requested a use variance to permit a residentially zoned house and lot to be used for “professional offices and business use”. The Board unanimously denied the requested use variance. The appellee sought review of this decision pursuant to the then existing IC 18-7-2-76, being Burns § 53-974, in the Marion Superior Court, Room 6, the Honorable Rufus C. Kuykendall, Judge, presiding; and that proceeding resulted in a judgment reversing the decision of the Board. The Board appealed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metro. Board of Zoning Appeals v. Standard Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Kunz v. WatermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Pace v. Peter Couture & Southern Express Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. METROPOLITAN BD. OF ZON. APP. OF MARION CO. v. RumpleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. METRO. BD. OF ZA OF MARION CTY., 2d D. v. RumpleIndiana Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals v. Sheehan Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Reinking v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals of Marion CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Board of Zoning App. of City of Whiting v. McFaddenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Speedway Board of Zoning Appeals v. PopcheffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API