Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Conrad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

Carl W. F. Mueller was the owner of lot 18 in Phillips & Pay’s addition to the city of Chicago, which was occupied by him as a homestead, and also owned certain other real estate of large rental value. He died testate, and the only indebtedness of his estate was the widow’s award, amounting to $1260, of which $512 was paid, and the balance, $748, was not paid. The executor of the testator’s will was Louis Conrad, one of the defendants in error herein, and because of the unpaid residue of the widow’s award he filed a petition on June 7, 1894, in the probate court of Cook county, praying for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartwell v. McDonaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Bursen v. GoodspeedIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Hartman v. SchultzIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Allen v. ShepardIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Barrows v. BarrowsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morris Investment Co. v. SkeldonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Moseley v. NevilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Heckmann v. DetlaffIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Huber v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  5. Claffy v. FarrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API