Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Schultz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1882PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Randolph county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The facts in this case appear by admission on demurrer to the bill. Prior to his death, which occurred on the 11th day of April, 1873, William H. Bruggeman was the owner in fee of the lands in controversy, and resided thereon, up to the time of his death, with his family, as his homestead. Conrad Welge was appointed administrator, and under an order of the county court obtained leave to sell the real estate of the intestate to pay debts. The administrator sold the premises to Christian Brockmyer, and made him a deed therefor in the usual form of administrators’ deeds. Afterwards Christian…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartwell v. McDonaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Bursen v. GoodspeedIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Conklin v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Wolf v. OgdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Kingman v. HigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brokaw v. OgleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Pioneer Mortgage Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Hanna v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People ex rel. Wells v. LanhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Atherton v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API