Legal Opinion
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Zadora
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 17, 2001No. AC 20185PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendants, Karen Zadora and Richard Forsey, appeal from the judgment of the trial court holding them in contempt of court. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly held that (1) the plaintiff had met its burden of proof concerning the defendants’ noncompliance with an existing court order and (2) the defendants were in contempt of court and in violation of the terms of an existing injunction. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*830The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our consideration of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Potter v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Duve v. DuveConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brody v. BrodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Gravius v. KleinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Gerber v. Disciplinary Board of the North Dakota Supreme CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Santoro v. SantoroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Parisi v. ParisiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.