Northrop Grumman Corp. v. Factory Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The Opinion filed on August 14, 2008, 538 F.3d 1090, is amended as follows:
Slip Opinion page 10671, line 19, 538 F.3d at 1094, insert the following text: “We will ‘not artificially create ambiguity where none exists. If a reasonable interpretation favors the insurer and any other interpretation would be strained, no compulsion exists to torture or twist the language of the policy.’ ” Evans v. Safeco Life Ins. Co., 916 F.2d 1437, 1441 (9th Cir.1990) (quoting Allstate Ins. Co. v.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Palmer v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Six Flags, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Joan Opara v. Janet YellenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Wapato Heritage, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Arch Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. Factory Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.