Woodall v. Delatour
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Phillips Circuit Court in Chancery. Hon. J. N. Cypert, Circuit Judge. 1. It was error to declare a lien on the lands for the amount of the taxes upon the personal property. There is no law to warrant it. 2. It is not averred that Delatour was seized or had the care of the lands, and this case falls within the rule of Peay, adm’r v. Field, 30 Ark., 690; Gantt’s Pig., Sec. 5233.
1Opinion of the Court
DuYal, Special Judge.
On 18th day oí April, A. D. 1876, the appellee filed his complaint in equity, against Mrs. S. W. Woodall, Bythena E. WoodJl, Arthur B. Woodall, and Mary E. Woodall, minors, and D. E. Holland, as guardian for Bythena, Arthur B. and Mary E. Woodall, and on the same day summons, was issued, directed to the sheriff, and returned served.
The complaint alleges and sets forth that the plaintiff, as agent for the defendants, on the 16th day of April, 1874, paid the taxes assessed on certain land therein described, amounting to the sum of three hundred and twenty-eight dollars and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Schrum ex rel. Gaither v. BoldingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Belleclair Planting Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- New York Life Insurance v. NicholSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Dudley v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.