Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Nichol

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). At the outset it may be stated that the lien sought to be enforced by the tax collector does not derive its validity from § 10053 of Crawford & Moses ’ Digest providing that certain agents paying taxes upon the lands of their principal, of which such agents have the care, are entitled to the benefits of the State’s lien for taxes. See Peay v. Field, 30 Ark. 600, and Woodall v. Delatour, 43 Ark. 521. This court has also laid down the rule that a mortgagee or other lienor who, for the protection of his own interest, pays taxes assessed on the property, will…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Ringo v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  3. Hinchman v. MorrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Griffing v. PintardMississippi Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Kemp v. CossartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Taaffe v. SandersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Holloway v. Bank of AtkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Person v. CogbillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Quarry Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API