Woodson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was indicted and convicted for rape. Sentence was forty years' imprisonment. Two issues are presented on appeal.
I
It is argued that the admission into evidence of the defendant's fingerprint record from the Opelika Police Department constituted error because (1) it indicated that he had a criminal record and (2) it violated his constitutional rights because the record was made when the defendant was a juvenile.
Fingerprints found at the scene of the crime were matched to those of the defendant through the use of a fingerprint record or card on file in the Opelika Police…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- John Wesley Ralls v. John R. Manson, Commissioner of Correction of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Buchannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Gratton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.