Legal Opinion

Woodson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 23, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was indicted and convicted for rape. Sentence was forty years' imprisonment. Two issues are presented on appeal.

I

It is argued that the admission into evidence of the defendant's fingerprint record from the Opelika Police Department constituted error because (1) it indicated that he had a criminal record and (2) it violated his constitutional rights because the record was made when the defendant was a juvenile.

Fingerprints found at the scene of the crime were matched to those of the defendant through the use of a fingerprint record or card on file in the Opelika Police…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. John Wesley Ralls v. John R. Manson, Commissioner of Correction of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Buchannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Gratton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API