Foster v. Florida
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Sup. Ct. Fla. Cer-tiorari denied.
Statement of Justice Stevens respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.
In response to Justice Thomas’ concurring opinion, I think it appropriate once again to emphasize that the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari does not constitute a ruling on the merits. See Knight v. Florida, 528 U. S. 990 (1999) (opinion of Stevens, J., respecting denial of petitions for writ of certiorari); Singleton v. Commissioner, 439 U. S. 940, 942-946 (1978) (opinion of Stevens, J., respecting denial of petition for writ of certiorari).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Knight v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
3Cited by24 opinions
- Clarence Ray Allen v. Steven W. Ornoski, Warden, of the California State Prison at San Quentin Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Commonwealth v. Smith, W., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Lucas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Reynolds v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.