Legal Opinion

Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. S.H.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 2015No. E063011UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, J.

Defendant and appellant S.H. (mother) is the biological mother of C.G. (bom in 2013), the child at issue in the present appeal, as well as B.H. (bom in 2011), who is C.G.’s half sibling. Both children were removed from mother’s custody, and her parental rights were eventually terminated. On appeal, mother contends that the order terminating her parental rights as to C.G. must be reversed for failure to comply with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). We agree, and therefore reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dwayne P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ivy B.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Marin County Department of Health & Human Services v. G.R.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Anthony V.California Court of Appeal · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Lydia O.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Shahida R.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Kristina C.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. In re K.T.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. In re Rylei S.California Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API