Legal Opinion

Mannell v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 22, 1928No. 8735Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff alleges be purchased a bill of lading issued by defendant, which misrepresented the articles, was relied upon by plaintiff, and to his damage. Prom the evidence it appears that plaintiff purchased secondhand pipe in New**York; that he relied upon the seller in respect to condition; that for payment he established an irrevocable agency or letter of credit' to that end in New York; that the seller delivered the pipe in bulk to defendant, and received a bill of lading for so many “pieces of 6-ineh wrought iron pipe”; that the seller delivered the bill to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin Nichols & Co. v. The Isla De Panay. Sanchez v. Same. E. Tolibia & Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. AUSTIN NICHOLS & COMPANY v. Isla De PanaySupreme Court of the United States · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API